Posts Tagged ‘fashion’

It’s interesting I immediately equate this topic to women. The idea of a “common thread”, at least in the context of this project, implies it is universal to most, if not all, people. However, when it comes to sexual modesty the consideration men might display this characteristic as often as women simply did not occur to me. Perhaps I’ve watched too many sporting events where men have absolutely no hesitation painting the logo of their favorite team on their fat bellies and jiggling it for the world to see. I understand this particular behavior is not, in the any sense of the word, sexual. But it does require shedding clothes in an attempt to draw attention. Sexually modest people don’t do that. Please don’t misunderstand. I’m sure men experience sexual modesty too, but not publicly. I assume it shows itself when they finally shut their exploit-bragging pie holes and get behind closed doors. Then modesty raises its ugly head (please excuse the inadvertent and somewhat disgusting analogy) and all bravado is dropped (sorry again). This may seem harsh – and not fair to the many fine men who have advanced beyond the Neanderthal stage – but it’s pretty clear a lot of guys have earned it. So we’re going to stick to female sexual modesty which, like most female perspectives, is far more interesting. (If it makes you happy substitute “male” for “female” from this point forward. No one’s stopping you.)

The most obvious way women communicate sexual modesty is through fashion. Since fashion is geared towards attracting attention (sexual or not) what a woman wears can be very revealing (again, oops). Yet it’s really not about the amount of clothing worn, although that can be a signal. (And let’s face it. There is a reason why in some cultures you can only see a woman’s eyes while she’s in public. Some may cite religion, some may cite social custom. I cite repression masquerading as modesty. But hey, maybe that’s just me.) It’s also about how clothing accentuates a woman’s body. Sure, wearing a burlap sack sounds like an admittedly farfetched fashion alternative for the extremely sexually modest woman. But even that can be deceiving. A skilled tailor can gather the burlap here, pinch it there, insert a few strategically placed slits, and dye that sucker scarlet. Suddenly what was once proclaimed “I don’t know what you’re thinking about, but don’t think it about me” has transformed from feed sack to heart attack. Especially in Nebraska.

While clothing can provide clues, sexual modesty is often demonstrated far more clearly through gestures and behavior. We’ve all seen this. Let’s illustrate with a little quiz and see if you can identify the least sexually modest woman in the following scenario. (Again, remember the reason we’re talking about women is because I apparently have unshakeable, but only mildly substantiated beliefs about this subject when it comes to men.)

You’re sitting in a cocktail lounge enjoying a quiet drink. Of the following who would you assume is the least sexually modest woman? A woman who…

(a) sits in the corner, minds her own business, doesn’t say a word and never touches her hair
(b) smiles at you from across the room while twirling a strand of hair (hers) around her finger
(c) plops on your lap uninvited, bites your earlobe, then flings her hair about your face like those giant scrubby strips in a car wash

If you guessed (b) or (c), sorry. The correct answer is (a). Confused? Doesn’t seem right? Never forget human behavior is complex, my friend, and until you learn to read it like a champion poker player reads eyes, you’ll misjudge. In this case (a) is correct for a very simple reason, a reason that’s been drilled into your head forever. When it comes to unexpected behavior, it’s always the quiet ones.

Interestingly, signs of sexual modesty become easier to identify when the behaviors aren’t as extreme. For the most part (excluding those shifty quiet types) sexually modest women don’t engage in coquettish behavior. The sexual modest don’t bat their eyelashes or play with their hair. They don’t laugh too robustly at stupid and insipid observations. They don’t dance alone. When they do dance, it’s always with a measure of control. And it’s very rare you’ll find a sexually modest woman using her belly button for jello shots.

Life being the contradictory ball of confusion it is, we shouldn’t find it surprising what we perceive as sexual modesty will often have the opposite effect than intended. The more sexually modest someone appears, the more desirable they become. It could be a result of their strong sense of self, a confident understanding of who they are. It could spark the old hunter-gatherer instinct – the more difficult the hunt, the more rewarding the payoff. Or maybe it’s because women are simply smarter when it comes to these things. If you want to get a man’s attention, confuse him. Sexual modesty can easily do that. Call it a form of reverse psychology if you like. Whatever it is, it certainly works. It also explains why we men paint our bodies like a drunken Picasso, howl our primal screams and fearlessly rip our shirts off in front of a nationally televised audience. It really has nothing to do with modesty, sexual or otherwise. But it’s uncomplicated and feels oh so good. Or so I’ve been told.
———-
Learn more about The Common Threads Project.

This morning I stumbled upon The Catalog of Cool, a book published in 1982 and purchased around the same time. It was tucked away in a low corner of a bookcase, long forgotten. Edited by Gene Sculatti, a contributor to Rolling Stone magazine in the 1970’s, The Catalog of Cool gives us…well, let’s hear it straight from the editor’s typewriter.

WHAT IS COOL?

Elvis was cool, but so is Elvis Costello. Sinatra was cool, but so is Blondie. Naked City was cool, but so is Dallas. Lolita was cool, but so is The Godfather.

True cool is eternal. Neither fad nor fashion, trend nor taste, the concept links past and present with a snap of the fingers. Zap! Gillespie and Dylan. Toreador pants…and toreador pants. Cool is the essence of style – daring, personal, rare. Yet, in a world of ever-encroaching uncool, it has become harder and harder to distinguish the real thing.

The Catalog of Cool stands as your ultimate guide, leading you to those rare and enduring items, the coolest of the cool.

The book uses a variety of far-out fonts and visual tricks to draw in the reader, including lots of photos and illustrations. It’s been 30 years since this hopeful bible of hip was released. I thought it would be interesting to leaf through and see how well the coolitude of some of the mod, rad and groovy stuff listed within this time capsule has stood the test of time. Or at least my test of time. I know, I know. Cool is in the eye of the individual, but for now I’m going to ignore that inconvenient fact and look at this through my very individualized lens. Maybe you don’t think that’s cool. No problem. I’m cool with that.

After some introductory notes and history the book is divided into eight chapters: Sounds, Screen, Ink, Threads, Good Looks, Rest ‘N’ Rec, Tube, and Wheels. There’s plenty of juice in each, but I’m not here to rehash everything. Instead, let’s focus on four chapters: Sounds, Screen, Ink, Threads. Perhaps we’ll revisit the others at a future date, but for now let’s go mining for those sparkly diamonds and dull zirconias.

Sounds
- Much to his eternal credit or damnation, Sculatti starts with Abba which he refers to as “polar pop.” It’s a bold move to proclaim Abba cool back in 1982, so props for his fearlessness.
- He includes The Flamingos based solely upon their cover of “I Only Have Eyes for You” which he says “sounds like a transmission from outer space.” Lots of people like the song (including me), but I wonder if including a one-hit wonder group would compel a current version of this book to include Semisonic or Blind Melon. God, I hope not.
- He mentions The Rolling Stones with the caveat “dead from the neck down since ’67.” I would’ve phrased it exactly the opposite while pushing the date forward to 1972 or so.
- I had never heard of Swamp Dogg before buying this book and, quite frankly, I had forgotten all about him until a minute ago. But anyone who has the cojones to write and record a song titled “California is Drowning and I Live by the River” shortly after the release of “London Calling” deserves some sort of acknowledgement. And bless his soul, he’s still around doing that thing he does. Whatever that is.
- All credibility would’ve been lost had The Velvet Underground gone unmentioned. Thankfully they didn’t, so now we can move forward.

Screen
An entire essay is devoted to James Bond and, with tepid apologies to Roger Moore, Bond’s screen coolness is laid at the Scottish feet of Sean Connery. There’s a bit of bemoaning that the world has changed too much to properly continue with the Bond franchise (and remember, this was 1982), so the idea was floated that 007 should slide gently into retirement, buy a home in Jamaica, consider writing a book and spark up a spliff. And until Daniel Craig came along, that would’ve been the right decision.

The film choices are, as you might expect, eclectic. Any list of films which includes Bringing Up Baby, Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, Dirty Harry and Motel Hell is worth note. However, what really jumps out is 1972’s Prime Cut which is described as “Totally flipsville!” Yeah, that’s certainly one way to put it. Makes me all the more proud I had my moment with Lee Marvin.

Ink
Since writing about writing takes a lot of writing this is the longest chapter. The usual suspects dot the list of great cool books, although the omission of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is curious. It’s not the greatest book ever written, not by any stretch of the imagination. But when the editor defines cool as “the fullest expression of what it is that’s different or unique about a person” it’s hard to see how Hunter Thompson skipped past his radar. Yet Ozzie Nelson’s 1977 autobiography Ozzie made the list. Go figure.

It can’t be that Thompson was slighted for drug use. The list contains plenty of books either written by or featuring characters who lived in a constant drug-induced haze. Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up to Me, Mine Enemy Grows Older and Red Dirt Marijuana among them. I don’t want to speculate, but I will anyway. I imagine it’s jealousy. They both worked for Rolling Stone around the same time and Thompson, for all his boorish behavior, was far better known than Gene Sculatti. Maybe excluding him was a small knife to the ribs, a “this is what I really think of you, Mr. Gonzo” thing. Perhaps it gave Sculatti a measure of professional revenge. But all these years later it is Thompson’s works which remain in print while magnum opuses like The Catalog of Cool can only be found by unlikely accident. If the intent was to diminish Thompson it didn’t work out too well. The lesson is clear, boys and girls. Nothing good ever comes from jealousy.

This chapter also contains essays on Sci-Fi, the coolest PI’s and magazines. One thing which particularly caught my eye was a magazine called Sleazoid Express. How great is that? Sleazoid Express. The name hints at a certain type of content, but it’s not exactly what you might imagine (although it’s close). The thrust was analysis and reviews of those gritty movies popular around the Times Square area. Not porn, rather early slasher and gore films. Wizard of Gore, Africa Blood and Guts, Revenge of the Shogun Women, films like that. Whatever. I just think the magazine’s name was pretty awesome and deserved mention.

Threads
Not surprisingly this is the funniest chapter in the book simply because today’s fashion always looks hilarious tomorrow. From mini dresses with a Campbell soup label print to clip-on bow ties to sack dresses to zoot suits to tab collar shirts there’s a rib-tickler in here for everyone. Hairstyles are also discussed. I suppose I could run through some of those beauties too, but it’s easy enough (and leads to more immediate laughter) to scout them down on your own. It’s not difficult. Just find any ‘hip’ film or music video made more than five minutes ago.

I’d continue on but I’m suddenly possessed by a desire to don shades, slip into my harness boots, learn to snap my fingers both on my right and left hand, and go hang out on a street corner looking all disinterested. You’re welcome to join me. That is, if you feel cool. Well do you feel cool, punk?

My friend Tracey crafts wonderful scarves, cowls, neck warmers, and baby hats, among other goodies. She recently asked if the lovely Ms. Trask and the effervescent Red would consent to modeling a selection of her hand-knitted cowls and, if in the process, I could photograph them for her Etsy SassyKnits website. Tracey’s been using mannequins and felt showing ladies wearing her creations was a far better marketing strategy. I certainly could not quibble with that logic. And if I may be so bold, her choice of models was inspired.  Either one of them could make a burlap sack look like the height of fashion. Of course these are not burlap sacks, they are cowls. They’re also mini works of art.

I told Tracey suggesting Ms. Trask and Red as models was a spectacular choice, but using me as the photographer was questionable. I stressed I am not, nor will ever be, the modern day equivalent of Richard Avedon, Herb Ritts or the guy who shoots the ads for Wal-Mart. I’ve never shot anything resembling “fashion photography” and my personal fashion sense is virtually non-existent. She shushed away my concerns, handed me a container of cowls, and said, “Have at it!”

So I went at it.

Please do yourself a favor and visit Tracey’s SassyKnits site to see her entire line of products. Thanks!